an interesting article on democracy I found on
Hi everyone, as I have repeatedly made clear in articles I'm a real fan in terms of precise definition of political terms. For anything but a clear explanation of a term, leads only to fool freedom of the speaker.
After I expressed my opinion to terms like "Islamist", "Salafist" or "Christian-Jewish culture", I would write this article to a modest absolute favorite term of the policy, democracy.
The heading for this I have not chosen themselves, but the sentence I have in the first page of the bestseller "The pimps of globalization" by the renowned political and economic analyst Loretta Napoleoni discovered.
The term "democracy" is very dangerous, because this term offers politicians an absolute fool freedom. After the state leadership after 2 World War, the people made it clear that democracy is an alleged "value recognition" for average Joe consumer, have begun the people who connect this word with things like "freedom", "tolerance" and "peace", and if one now considered the attitude of people, made a kind "Religion of the 21st century" .
How so? Quite logical:
Like the state and army leaders before the religious faith of the people have used, in which they have wars and genocides in the garb of religion covered, it is happening today with the concept of democracy. Today, with the pretext simply invade Iraq and a million people killed, people have to cripple children ways to widows and women and then make his own corrupt system to power. The same with countries of Africa, the Caucasus, Afghanistan, North Korea, Vietnam, etc.
Because average Joe consumer has the term - the max. 2% of the population could be defined correctly - closed set in the heart. Although he connects with the concept of things like "freedom" and "peace" but that is what it is today or not he really is not today a reality.
Poltiker all over the world have these fools freedom for herself . If one one wants to assert its interests, to use in his speech before the TV cameras, three or four times the term "democracy " "democratic" wants or who clear away completely in the next election is still a " liberal-democratic values system, "added. The response of the population is secured.
Recently, this phenomenon can be especially with the riots experience in the Arab world, particularly in Egypt. Poltiker from the West who support the oppressive and dictator Hosni Mubarak , support and view as an important pillar their interests in the Arab world reported to be "concerned" and "troubled" about the situation and want to be there more "democracy" .
Aha, we have again the fool's freedom.
If we take the induced definition of the term "democracy " from Wikipedia, one could say that the Poliker are concerned that it does not democratic election in which the people themselves can decide who occupied government posts. The powerful and popular party "Ikhwan Al-Muslimin" hello.
But this is the definition of democracy how they should be. Since Obama, Westerwelle and Co. but never explicitly explained what she and her beloved buzzwords actually mean really there, of the Polti core highly sought-after freedom fools. Let us consider only the time today's article in the Bild-Zeitung, in which Westerwelle, which says that democracy has to win, not the religious extremists.
?
So we have to understand that so that only if a government is elected, which is controlled by the Western world and strongly sympathized with her vertretet and their interests, a democratic government is correct.
I've made the effort to establish a rule so that we all in today's political muddle-Warr, can look easy
"Any government is not acting in the interests of Western countries is undemocratic and extremist. "
only too happy I would be even with Mr Westerwelle sit at a table and show him who are the extremists. The Muslim Brotherhood advocates the interests of a population and to protect and conserve a Muslim society. In their national borders. But Western Europe, Israel and America want to spread their system and all its interests around the world, be it with wars in the name of "democracy " with the installation of a puppet as a state leader or with the support of a tyrant n and dictator who safeguard their interests in the country.
Who are the extremists?
After I expressed my opinion to terms like "Islamist", "Salafist" or "Christian-Jewish culture", I would write this article to a modest absolute favorite term of the policy, democracy.
The heading for this I have not chosen themselves, but the sentence I have in the first page of the bestseller "The pimps of globalization" by the renowned political and economic analyst Loretta Napoleoni discovered.
The term "democracy" is very dangerous, because this term offers politicians an absolute fool freedom. After the state leadership after 2 World War, the people made it clear that democracy is an alleged "value recognition" for average Joe consumer, have begun the people who connect this word with things like "freedom", "tolerance" and "peace", and if one now considered the attitude of people, made a kind "Religion of the 21st century" .
How so? Quite logical:
Like the state and army leaders before the religious faith of the people have used, in which they have wars and genocides in the garb of religion covered, it is happening today with the concept of democracy. Today, with the pretext simply invade Iraq and a million people killed, people have to cripple children ways to widows and women and then make his own corrupt system to power. The same with countries of Africa, the Caucasus, Afghanistan, North Korea, Vietnam, etc.
Because average Joe consumer has the term - the max. 2% of the population could be defined correctly - closed set in the heart. Although he connects with the concept of things like "freedom" and "peace" but that is what it is today or not he really is not today a reality.
Poltiker all over the world have these fools freedom for herself . If one one wants to assert its interests, to use in his speech before the TV cameras, three or four times the term "democracy " "democratic" wants or who clear away completely in the next election is still a " liberal-democratic values system, "added. The response of the population is secured.
Recently, this phenomenon can be especially with the riots experience in the Arab world, particularly in Egypt. Poltiker from the West who support the oppressive and dictator Hosni Mubarak , support and view as an important pillar their interests in the Arab world reported to be "concerned" and "troubled" about the situation and want to be there more "democracy" .
Aha, we have again the fool's freedom.
If we take the induced definition of the term "democracy " from Wikipedia, one could say that the Poliker are concerned that it does not democratic election in which the people themselves can decide who occupied government posts. The powerful and popular party "Ikhwan Al-Muslimin" hello.
But this is the definition of democracy how they should be. Since Obama, Westerwelle and Co. but never explicitly explained what she and her beloved buzzwords actually mean really there, of the Polti core highly sought-after freedom fools. Let us consider only the time today's article in the Bild-Zeitung, in which Westerwelle, which says that democracy has to win, not the religious extremists.
?
So we have to understand that so that only if a government is elected, which is controlled by the Western world and strongly sympathized with her vertretet and their interests, a democratic government is correct.
I've made the effort to establish a rule so that we all in today's political muddle-Warr, can look easy
"Any government is not acting in the interests of Western countries is undemocratic and extremist. "
only too happy I would be even with Mr Westerwelle sit at a table and show him who are the extremists. The Muslim Brotherhood advocates the interests of a population and to protect and conserve a Muslim society. In their national borders. But Western Europe, Israel and America want to spread their system and all its interests around the world, be it with wars in the name of "democracy " with the installation of a puppet as a state leader or with the support of a tyrant n and dictator who safeguard their interests in the country.
Who are the extremists?
Author: Abdullah Al-Maghrebi to prevent and to know foreign trade dependence also has that is necessary in case of doubt, in an emergency military mission to protect our interests, such as free trade routes, for example, all the regional instability, hit back that security will also affect our chances - negatively by trade, jobs and income. "
to Kohler's resignation. there was little or no positive reactions to the statement ofFederal Minister of Defence, Karl-Theodor Freiherr zu Guttenberg, the opening of the 9th European Security and Defense Conference in Berlin. :
to secure the trade routes and the sources of raw materials are to be regarded without doubt among military and global strategic perspective " war or a government that meets our needs Ob. the people suffer, because it exploits a dictator or because our soldiers enslave it does not matter because we only have a right to the we are doing well.
by the author Abdullah al Maghribi, there are other interesting article. 
Definitions: Communist Nazis Christian-Jewish dominant culture
Definitions: Communist Nazis Christian-Jewish dominant culture The columns of the Ummah, or Muslim-IslamistPhoto Sources: Horst Köhler -> cducsu.de and Dr. Karl Theo zu Guttenberg -> HP zuguttenberg.de
0 comments:
Post a Comment